Dual Executive :: essays research papers

three-fold Executive/ professorshipThe idea of an elective head of state for the Ameri piece of ass chief executive,in its conception, was virtually without precedent. The idea of an American two-foldpresidency, rent between domestic and foreign arenas is itself withoutprecedent. A soprano presidency would reconcile America well due to the pressures ofthe office of President of the United States. As Commander-in-Chief, thePresident bears incredible pressures and responsibilities. The President nononly has government agency in the United States, alone also tremendous influence throughoutthe world. It is not arrogant to change the presidency in order to manageAmericas gigantic interests all over the globe. The US is certainly notisolationistic anymore, so creating an office for a foreign affairs executive issimply realistic. Thus, the President is not only torn between domestic andforeign responsibilities, scarce s/he must find age to campaign. A duple presidencywith a dom estic and foreign leader could divide these electioneering duties. Inaddition, a dual presidency is better adapted to detention simultaneous crises. Adual presidency is a modern day answer to the realities of the Americanpresidency.Essentially, the idea of a dual executive is grow in the concept of aplural executive. Back in the time of the writing of the Constitution, someanti-federalists wanted a weak executive. This weak executive was called aplural executive or an executive council. (Storing 49) The purpose of such(prenominal) aplural executive was not only to weaken the executive, but also to prevent amonarchy from ruling. In fact, an anti-federalist named Randolph opposed anexecutive-of-one so lots that he believed it to be the foetus (fetus) of themonarchy.(Storing 93) Yet today the threat of monarchy is laughable.The proposed dual executive has no intentions of weakening that setoff.Rather, a dual executive makes the runner more efficient, focused, and in touch.Plural i s not a fitting term for the dual executive. This is because aplural executive implies several office holders, or a committee. The more people,the more chaos and disunity occurs.In the 70th chapter of The Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton make acase for an executive with a great deal of unity. If power was concentrated in asingle chief magistrate, then the branch would be more cohesive. Hamiltonrelied on the failures of plural executive in the level of Rome and Greece tomake a case against executive councils.Some whitethorn argue that by dividing the executive office, it saps the energyand vigor required of the job. Inversely, it can be argued that the Presidenthas so much to do that his energy is belittled by simply being spread too thin.